Sunday, November 7, 2010

Void on Fire: On Nadim Abbas' works


photo courtesy of the artist


Void on Fire

Venus Lau

“The fire runs, and hollers on the blank page”

Liu Wai Tong, “Mysticism, a Song of Failure”


Telling stories with the body itself, narrative cannot avoid the trajectory of moving from one door (material or imaginary) to another, walking or rushing between being and becoming, presence and absence. The window, which constitutes one of the primary moments of imagery in the visual language of Nadim Abbas, acts to interpret the door, demonstrating its dialectics of inside/outside without bringing it into ontological existence. For Abbas, the window is sometimes a gasp voiced in the midst of a confrontation between mirror images and sometimes a fountain of bliss for the voyeur. One portion of the installation “I Would Prefer Not To”(2009) is a line of windows formed by dark glass mounted with window grates. In “Untitled” (2000), the viewer is seduced to look through a window into a boxlike white room without doors. “Perspective Studies” (2001) places wheelchairs, light, and windows in a set intended to test the viability of optical illusions, the black-and-white checkered floor twisted nauseatingly out of space.


This interest in windows also extends to the grates and frames so ubiquitous throughout the city-scapes of of Hong Kong and South China. “The Bride Stripped Bare by Her Bachelors, Again” (2007) represents yet another attempt to interact with the possibilities of the window, here in the form of a sound installation making explicit reference to Marcel Duchamp. The work develops strata of signification, juxtaposing a porn magazine clipping resembling Duchamp's “Étant donnés,” window grates framing images of waterfalls, and a chair covered with cacti.


Within the household, the installation of window grates is typically intended to either prevent robbery or avoid small children falling out--these different aims that are actually one: the prohibition of traversal (through the window). Abbas further consolidates this interdiction by hanging his window frames on solid walls, a limit in contact with the rejection of continuity. Abbas is not, of course, the first person to transform observations of these grates into art. Mainland Chinese artist Liu Chuang's “Split Landscape” (2005) marks a similar such interrogation of the spatial functions of such extensions to the window, extracting the visual elements of a three-dimensional cage-like grate form once popular in Shenzhen and turning it into a stainless steel sculpture with a highly formalized and flattened visual presentation. This same object clearly serves different purposes in the practices of these two artists: Liu is concerned with researching a geometric aesthetic of the grate as an image by peeling it off from the functionality of the defensive structure, while Abbas displaces the windows in order to dissolve the dialectics of inside/outside through a discontinuity in visual perception raised by a physical aluminum veil. The window, here, is like a ship--Foucault's heterotopia par excellence--a “placeless place ... closed in on itself and at the same time ... given over to the infinity of the sea” (Michel Foucault, “Of Other Spaces”). It goes nowhere and everywhere.


Besides the window, the figure of the Rorschach test image makes a significant appearance in the practice of Nadim Abbas. The window grate patterns from “I Would Prefer Not To” actually correspond to ten strictly symmetrical inkblots from the Rorschach, while “Untitled (14-03)” (2010) consists of a set of drawings mingling the outlines of such inkblots with the floor plans of apartments in Hong Kong in which there occurred a homicide or suicide on 14 March within the past 15 years. This project creates an imaginary non-space defined only by absence. Less obviously, example “Ornament and Crime” (2008) involves an installation constructed out of white pipes through which observers roll ceramic fengshui balls before smashing on the floor. The symmetrical design of the pipes here certainly resonates with the Rorschach test images, if remotely. Abbas makes reference to clinical psychology again in “I Would Prefer Not To,” another component of which is a specimen box of different manga action figures intended to correspond with MCMI-III (Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III) disorders. In comparison with the hype of psychoanalysis adopted as cultural theory in the art world, Abbas is far more concerned with psychopathology. The body, which Schilling calls an “unfinished biological and social project,” is manipulated and fragmented by the clinical gaze, while psychology expands and limits the possible dimensions of the subject through language. Here, art cuts into the human body without the presence of the latter.


Nadim Abbas’s latest project, “Cataract” (2010), is consistent with a certain obsession with windows and grates, including a light box highlighting an image of a waterfall (similar to that used in “The Bride Stripped Bare”). But this is only half of the project: the other half is a continuously running shower system within an environment making reference to a certain filmic anxiety, mirroring the imagery of the waterfall in a different register. The continuous artificial waterfalls may resemble the cylindrical lamp depicting the Iguazu Falls that features prominently in Wong Kar-wai's movie Happy Together, or perhaps the digital fengshui calenders mass-produced in mainland China, typically consisting of a large light box occupied by a lush landscape or Buddhist images on one side and digital clock on the other. It would be overly hasty, however, to cloak this work in the narrative fabric of social criticism related to the extremes of Fordist production modes or clichéd cinematic reference.


The title of this project relates the imagery of the waterfall with a pun, a linguistic forking path. Semiotically and physically, as translucent water is beat into a milky color by virtue of its own velocity, the project speaks in opacity. But opacity, from the window grates that divide the fabricated continuity of an imagined landscape to pieces of dark glass, deformed floor plans, and inkblot images, far from acting to block vision, can actually open up space for new interpretations of the phenomenology of space. This space, however, is never as simple as a large void or volume to be filled with whatever appears. Opacity in some ways wipes out the visual markers of certain objects while producing new schematics of signification and metaphors, but, on the other hand, it also provides a “universalized process of recognition” (Slavoj Zizek, “The Matrix, or the Two Sides of Perversion”) for the viewer--quite similar, in fact, to the function of the Rorschach test. For Nadim Abbas, the production of the space of possible symbolic engineering is a fire that simultaneously burns down and lights up its object; the singularity of space is always followed by vanishing, remaining in an unavoidable moments of becoming or morphing into a new and ephemeral appearance.

周俊辉: 衍生的衍生




原文载于artfroum.com.cn

汉雅轩(HANART SQUARE) | HANART TZ GALLERY(HANART SQUARE)

香港新界葵涌(近大连排道)工业街17-21号美安工业大厦二楼

2010.09.30–2010.10.23

Venus Lau

白立方式的展场内尽是画布上的金甲干戈、锦绣绫罗,带来的重量感犹如将倾玉山。周俊辉的第四次个展展出其新作品,再一次展示艺术家的签名式:截取电影场景(连同字幕和荧幕的黑边)的绘画。周的前作聚焦于以现代为背景的电影,如《无间道》、《纵横四海》和《英雄本色》。《衍生的衍生》作品的蓝本则来自古装电影,包括《唐伯虎点秋香》、《投名状》、《济公》、《霸王别姬》、《倚天屠龙记之魔教教主》等。新作品仍呼应艺术家一直关注的主题:《唐伯虎点秋香:没天分就不要画》表达的对艺术本身的诘问、《孔子:天下莫柔弱于水》(该句实来自《道德经》)陈述的哲学主题、《新半斤八两:繁荣盛世度度有金执》(2008)揭示的政治和香港人的身份认同问题。新作还增加了一个维度 - “衍生的衍生”,如《帝女花:将柳荫当做芙蓉帐》以电影《帝女花》为蓝本,该电影改编自同名粤剧,以明末长平公主的故事为创作灵感。《三国:不如弃子而取胜》(2009)的场景来自改编《三国演义》的《三国之见龙卸甲》。电影历史或文学人物带来的想象造就陈述,进而引发各种文本如粤剧和电影的生产。这些具有互文性的衍生物,像水晶棱面不断在自身和其身处的符号系统之间折射光线,一如早期摄影上过度曝光的虹影,以纯视觉体验消除某些历史的框线。


在 “超级真实”的世界,处处充斥没有指向的指向,若以复制/元件的二元对立来看待周俊辉对电影场景的“重置”,实在过分轻率,展览的题目(虽然英文用的字眼是“reproduction”)也在“衍生”一词上做文章,而非以忠实为本的“复制”。其实周俊辉的绘画并不以忠实重现细节和延展视觉为目的。作品不是复制,反而更像翻译,把作为热媒介的电影,转化为随时可以重阅的冷媒介,打破被叙述时间的牵引。翻译总是让人沉迷于“中心信息“是否准确传达。但周俊辉的作品一如永未完成的巴别塔,告知观者翻译不存在什么准确,只从新印证语言的异质性和随机性。

除了借用古装片创作,周俊辉新作的特点来自画面的光泽感,这在展场射灯光下尤为明显。另一方面,新作画面明显较早期作品精细。这种美学转变并不单源于艺术家的笔触实验,画面从粗糙到精细的过度,道出香港视听媒介从VCD到DVD的转变,也阐述了当今图像经济学的等级系统:高解像度是进入图像经济体系的本钱,解像度低的“烂图” (Hito Steyerl口中的poor image)只能在体系外围打转,成为该制度的无产阶级。科技实现观众对高解像度和清晰的不断追求,以致各种媒介成为以视觉快感争夺注意力的战场。

作品的试图通过转换媒介脱离原叙述,从原有历史语境解放视觉符号,可是作品旁边图文并茂的解说却成为返回旧历史语境的康庄大道。艺术家的作品虽然与前作在细节上有异,但并未在概念上带来突破。

展评:幽灵证据




幽灵证据 (Spectral Evidence) 1a Space

香港九龙土瓜湾码头角道63号牛棚艺术村14号

2010.07.15 - 2010.09.05



展覽标题在香烛铺成行成市的香港,确实引人注目。展覽的目的并非要印证鬼神的存在,也无意把鬼的極端他性,作为藝術家的狄奥尼索斯面具。“幽灵证据”源于17世纪美国的巫女审判案, 赋予异象和梦境在法律上的合法性。策展人林司律道出,展覽旨在“探讨历史如何像幽灵一样影响現况”。



二人組Lin+Lam 的作品Even The Trees Would Leave (2005) 通過攝影和文字聚焦香港越南難民营(原址已改建为高尔夫球场),对旁观和消费他人痛苦的行为极尽讽刺。 装置/录像作品Tomorrow I leave (2010) 内容环绕马来西亚業已關閉的越南难民营,展示众多白色木台上的明信片、来自難民營的物品、并置馬來西亞風光和前难民信件的录像。作品恰似祭坛,显影人在飄泊流程中的呢喃。



梁硕恩的录像作品Poe (2007)從爱倫坡(Edger Allan Poe)身后的线索 - 包括其故居、遠房親戚、文字等 - 展开史密生(Robert Smithson)式的地點/非地點辯證。錄像作品Time Museum Time (2010)以藝術家的招牌动作 - 蹲,透过身体的空间概念回應庫哈斯(Rem Koolhaas) 在广州的美术馆项目,作品和内格里(Antonio Negri)批评“junkspace(“垃圾空间”)是生物政治”异曲同工。



Horizon出自Sreshta Rit Premnath之手, 藝術家从网络收集哥伦布纪念碑的照片,消去人物雕像,留下纪念碑底座的图像 - 历史叙事基础的虚拟的自明性隨之崩塌。



展覽明显并非探寻所谓“历史真相” ,历史在此是载体。作品展示的历史残骸作为缝合点(point de caption),建构永不闭合的的文学机器,通过建构叙述展开历史机理的新创口和文化病理学,成为无止的叙述空间。这个空间恰如德里达(Jacques Derrida)的幽灵,不属于现在或将来,它暗示放射式时间性的延展,消解线性历史,抱着自己没有躯体的躯体,又作为主人能指,从我们感官擦过。此外,作品对不同地点的意象,是以语句结构和之间的隐喻关系“定位“的非地点,这和作品之中的文字譜出双重文学性。香港鲜有展出以研究和檔案为基礎的藝術,是次展覽填补了这方面的空白。可惜,部分作品的符号过于强势:汇丰商标、殖民地难民营,维多利亚皇后像,对某些惯于把香港展覽化约为“后殖民叙述”的观众来说,诱惑实在太大,有形成意指短路的隐患。

张洹:我山之石




(Published by Leap magazine)

张洹:创世纪
Zhang Huan:Dawn of Time
上海美术馆
Shanghai Art Museum
2010.02.03 — 2010.02.28
Venus Lau

張洹個展“創世紀”二月初在上海美術館開幕,展出五件作品,包括三件裝置作品和兩幅香灰畫。無論是因為“張洹首個中國個展”,還是因為2008年展覽被取消的風波,開幕式上蒸騰著由好奇醞釀出的某種期待,漫溢在悉心打扮的人群和名牌手袋之間。

作品“創世紀”散落的老青磚在發鏽的車斗後面拖了大半個展廳,車斗上面站著小馬標本。作品的青磚是從上海的拆遷地區收集所得。同樣的素材也運用在“寶塔” 上:青磚堆砌的鐘形塔上一窗洞開,內置小豬標本。兩件作品不約而同借用動物意象。其實,張洹並不是使用動物意象的新手,2002年的裝置“大佛” ,2004年雕塑“馬”,2005年的雕塑“驢”,2008年的裝置“竹林百賢”都用上動物形象甚至是活動物(如“竹林百賢”的猴子)。現代動物和人之間不是明了的隔扇,而是懸而未決的地域(有可能是阿甘本(Agamben)所指的 Homo Sacer),這片地域是人性和動物性的豁口。但張洹的作品似乎不屬於這種開放地域,而是擬人法,把我們和動物之間的距離拉的更遠。

作品“英雄一號”背對展廳入口——不知道是否對凝視的抗拒——臉熟非常,這件大型雕塑,跟藝術家2008年作品巨人1,2,3 號非常類近,同樣是以上百張經過處理的牛皮拼湊而成,形式上也同樣是殘缺獸肢看似隨意而痛苦的糾結。“英雄一號”披著一身腫瘤狀的凹凸不平,裂邊和累贅,但觀者還是可以辨認出肉食動物粗拙的前肢,人的耳廓和模糊的臉。作品的粗糲形態與其說是來自藝術家對不同材質的隨意實驗,倒不如說是來自計算,作品的粗悍掩蓋了其機關算盡(張洹有專用的車間加工毛皮)。“英雄一號”是否是藝術家對自己和同代中國藝術家的一種反諷:英雄是由預設的時間性事件築就的。经典的悲情英雄俄狄浦斯通過預言得知自己將來杀父娶母,雖然他千方百計逃避歹運,他一路從命運安排的荊途走來,從命運那里收集成就其英雄身分的事件,最後悲劇還是如期降臨。張洹出國成名再歸國再在國家級美術館辦個展,聽起來耳熟能詳,藝術家的命運,是否就是英雄的劇目一樣是先驗的圖冊?

香灰製作的繪畫作品“水庫”和“大運河”,畫面圖像參照六七十年代的新聞照片,表現了至少一部分人的集體回憶,另一部份沒有相關經驗的人回憶缺席的懷念。張洹在訪問時提到收集香灰是“凝固靈魂”,此概念與老新聞照片表現的集體性一拍即合:一方面是無數善信對形而上存在和遙遙彼岸的遠觀,另一方面是圖像通過大眾媒體無限複製和傳播。可惜作品僅僅憑借兩者脆弱聯繫成型,作品難免有些先天不足。比起這兩張畫(和張洹其他的香灰畫),協助藝術家生產作品的“張洹工作室”分工的細緻似乎更具美學性:工作人員從上海和其周邊廟宇收集香灰,把香灰按顏色分類,再以膠質把香灰按選定圖像固定在畫布上。這種精微彷如脆薄的白紙上無數深灰直線,也如卡爾維諾在未來千年文學備忘錄:輕逸篇引艾米莉·狄根森 (Emily Dickinson)詩句:
“一个花托,一片花瓣和一根刺针,
在一个普通的夏日的清晨
长颈瓶上挂满露珠”。在香灰畫的薄弱概念的反襯下,其藝術形式只能變得更矫饰冗长,反不如香灰和車間本身。

同樣是運用甚至濫用中國符號,張洹相對比其他藝術家是要显得圓熟些。或許因為張洹甚少運用飽和的顏色和質地,故此其作品裡的佛像,書法,漢字,舊照片和香灰,雖然是耳熟能詳的“中國牌”,可是打出來的確是比較順眼,作品有時候也甚至靜謐過機警過。比如製作“上海家譜”(2001),張洹用墨汁把祖先的名字塗在臉上,直到滿臉烏黑,剩下一雙眼睛。作品的概念非常直白:中國人宗法制度/文化遺產,成為消失的“自我”的包袱。墨汁和筆畫下的皮膚吸收了自己的光澤,緊繃在自己的物性里,象抽象畫里被筆觸和色塊洗練的臉,變成了純粹的肉-骨骼和肌理的困獸斗。

創世紀作為標題,刻意指涉舊約聖經首章創世記。創世記和其他宗教經典一樣,包含天地起始和早期文明誕生的敘述。展覽的英文題目沒有用上創世紀/記英文 Genesis,卻翻譯成Dawn of the Time。 Dawn,即破曉。創世記描述上帝說“光,就有了光”。又因為光是好的,所以需把日夜分隔。破曉就是晝夜切割線。這次展覽標題直指藝術的真實困境,就像齊澤克(Slavoj Zizek) 所講共產國家建築上揭露了政治真相(不管當權者口里是怎樣的“人民至上”,大樓頂上政治領導的巨型雕塑形象地道出人民的卑微):成為藝術家是不是等於成為破曉,擔當藝術史各個“時期”的分界線?

這次展覽作品的大尺寸(當然在國家級美術館展示巨型藝術品一般都被認為合理)和寓言式視覺語言,令人聯想起拉伯雷(François Rabelais)的著作《巨人傳》(The Life of Gargantua and of Pantagruel)。小說中荒誕又枝節蔓生的劇情加上主角巨人父子的驚人體量,本來氛圍應該像巴洛克皺摺一樣繁繁複複,時而舒展時而緊縮。可是拉伯雷放肆的幽默和想像力像氫氣一樣注滿作品,其輕靈在諷刺中世紀文化時足以做到四兩撥千斤(笑就是可以控制的瘋狂)。反之,創世紀的作品概念薄弱,拖曳著自己的重量,艱難的演著獨角戲,猶如展場鋪天蓋地的青磚。

希臘女妖美杜莎(Medusa)滿頭蛇髮,凝視她眼睛的人會變成頑石。其實變成石頭的人,都從美杜莎的凝視看到自己作為主體的沈重和無力——主體對他者的結構性依賴,作為向死而生的存在,主體面對作為永久入侵者/陌生人的死亡,無論顛覆還是接受,帶來的都是疏離。如果這次展覽的是石頭,它們,其實就是美杜莎面前的藝術家。Venus Lau

Tuesday, March 9, 2010

幾年前寫的六四文章

六四过了十六年,我才第一次走到街上。我一直觉得不上街不要紧,重要的是莫失,莫忘,记得,记着。每个人都有不同的悼念方法,有的人喊口号,有的人舞动旗帜,有的人痛哭,有的人沉默,也有人为了那些逝去的人在“默默中揪心,一根头发渐渐变白“。只要不忘记 。

游行队伍的口号浪涛一般云涌而起,我混在好多人当中,从铜锣湾到中环,维园到政府总部,我连一句平反六四都没有说,我真的,没有说。四周卷起的潮骚样的律动,在两边刮出跌宕的版画的黑线条,浪潮转折的地方勾着像压抑的荇藻般咸腥的喘息,然后一路颠颠顿踬至我身边-------那些结束一党专政释放民运人士民主万岁宛如渗进黑鹤带体温的铁色羽毛-------声浪嘎然而止,如触礁一样。我知道一定会有人要说我这种表现跟横额底下,干裂的嘴唇边的愤慨格格不入,我的木无表情是对那些神情哀伤的人们的背叛。那又怎样呢,对我没有买支联会的T恤我没有高举那些黑底白字的纸牌我没有抬着发泡胶制的民主女神边流汗边唱血染的风采,我好多好多都没有做,但我在队伍中间,我在里面走一步就说了一句话,是的,我患了中国人那种所谓内敛的遗传病,在公众场合尤其发作的厉害。如果有人要把我的沉默从我的肉骨剔出,我会说我对我的诉求很清楚,不需要口号的连连提醒。诉求很明确,因为我就在路上,队伍中间。被群体纳入吸收是危险的,但我今天不介意我作为个人的身份被模糊,成为“要求平反六四“的游行者之一员。

今天其实不是很热,但香港湿毒的天气,总是令人成身汗。纵我心静如柳下惠枯山水,明绿t 恤却紧贴着我皮肤为我湿涟涟,我的身体执意奉迎毒日尘封的阴霾,坚决不肯自然凉。柏油路上的热气,点点聚,变成触角,躯干,带毛的四肢,小小的黑蚂蚁,潜进我的布鞋底。鞋面套桃红的手绣鸳鸯,在绿彩线培植的莲叶底下吐气。好湿。伏在莲叶鸳鸯下,平素最冷静的彩蓝,感染潮气后竟渐渐变成暖色,慢慢炖着菊花细火。

今天才知道,为了别人行,为了很多人行,跟很多人行,好累。

香港人很善忘,不知是否与天气有关。十六年前那天,我的父母坐在电视前,透过夜视镜的绿瞳看长安大街,我们听见炮火,爆出的火星,看不见流血,大人杜绝幻想和视线游溢至坦克轮带底下,爸爸妈妈把我和妹妹的疑问埋在默默无言里。荧幕切换着绿色与橙色,长安大街的灯亮了就是橙色,有人用手掌扑灭了灯,街就变了绿色。爸爸说橙色的街灯是用来防雾的,其实北京少有雾,听着哪,一支支高大的街灯,谁用来燃亮硝烟。那些目击的街灯,那时候有没有闭上无睫毛的秃眼睛,默许鲜血蜿蜒而过,填满天安门前的灰砖??第二天学校罢课,我们对着粗糙的油印纸唱爱自由为自由,真奇怪我那时怎么会唱普通话,学校都没有教。

那时我呢,二年级,七岁。回家看鬼马哺哺车的时候,哺哺车香蕉黄的车身传来枪声。达达达。

扣在浅蓝色的确凉校服的黑纱,乌蝶鳞一样轻,后来纱跌了,我在小吃部顾住买薯片没有去捡。初夏时香港有一百万人大游行,社会课本写着香港人口有六百多万,一百万人,即是,全香港,六个人,就有一个人在那队伍里。好多人。中环排到西环,几个地铁站。公益金百万行都没有那么多人。一路行一路行,涉着自己的汗水而过。哈。六月四日。我爸妈,现在一句都没有提。只是忙着搞离婚,在大陆开制衣厂,裁纸样,剪布。我都记得,你们怎么说忘了呢。

现在你怎么跟我说你们忘了呢。啊。咸丰年的事你提来把鬼。喂。世道艰难我地要揾食呀姐姐仔。游甚么行,赶住返屋企煮饭。目睹那么多年轻的生命流逝,你怎能跟我说,啊,那是。几时的事。

那些学生,如果他们没有举起横额,如果他们没有绝食,如果他们没有面对全副武装,如果他们不是生在中国,如果,如果,他们有多十六年,看着自己仔大女大,油烟把老婆的脸颊晕黄,腰间的皮肉在微小的平淡里滋长。如果,如果什么都没有用,如果任何行动只会换来绝望,如果,如什么果,其人已殁。

旺角街头展出六四的图片。脸的肌肉明明摆好了哭的姿势,可我一滴眼泪也没有,好像出嫁闭上眼等开脸,等哀伤以棉细的白线,把纤稀的淡黑的汗毛般的克制,沿雪白香粉摊开的路,片掉。哭十六年,水塘都流干,流入记忆的死海。

不少人都集中观看受害者血肉模糊的死状。其实不需要血腥的影象配合,整件事情都足以刺痛任何人,当然,前提是每一个人都有良知。我看见有几个十几岁的年轻人,挂一身鲜烈的颜色,对六四死难者的照片指手画脚,说咁核突咪睇啦我唔駛食飯。我真想。车她一巴掌。连基本的人道关怀都没有,这些人脱了一身潋滟的时尚,底下就是废物。

我对着那些坦克入城,空寂大街的照片,感到特别心痛,通明的首都盛满了虚空,华灯底下空无一人,像丢空的电影布景,演员全死掉,感觉又荒诞又荒凉。装甲车开走了,仗打完了,人人都输,有人输手手脚脚有人输民心有人输家人有人输命,赢的只有僵绿的铁皮。抹杀了人文的无机金属,宛如里面从来没有过人,有意识自生自灭随机地杀戮。面向镜子,在自己的毛孔稍大的脸上窥见清冷的玻璃下固态的水银。面对坦克,就看见在背面聚满柔润的宝石光泽,軟嫩的粉红石榴红内脏。

未必人人都要做烈士,甚至不一定要上街,喊口号,买支联会的胶手带。只要记得,起码在六月四日的时候,在物质与娱乐的甜头之间,记得,有很多人,普通人,用血来提醒我们自由是要争取,革命尚未成功。

走着的时候我跟伟棠说,在中国,烈士没有价值,用刀剑枪矛血汗消费希望,到最后志气消磨,花从梅萼落,然明春依旧韶光艳,漾如线。伟棠说有的。有他们的价值的。现在看不到。过了好多年后,会看到六四的价值的。中环竖满玻璃幕墙建就的图腾,对面行车线上车辆熟练地滑过,车上的乘客拿相机拍游行的队伍。汇丰和中银大厦外墙好象一面面大镜,却什么都照不到。我忽然有误入仙境的虚虚的感觉,足底的路面恍恍惚惚生出了有机的弹性。要不然就是世界误入了以脚步叠成的仙境,眼睛半开看着成群的人的出行,像凝视小小玻璃瓶里桅杆轻脆,白帆摆出受风的圆浑的鼓胀姿势的模型船。

然后我说。真o加。

后记:去年十月路过长安街,时逢国庆,街上灯白如昼,硬生生挤出一个个皮笑肉不笑的假太阳,伪婵娟。无端的热情与喧闹压在黑夜上,黑夜就一点一点的断了呼吸,声声明如剪。谁还记得,十六年前。人人齐奔小康的步伐那么一致,怎复记那大街上,有几多双眼睛就此闭上。铛铛亮的皮鞋底下,经济收益的香甜里,谁还会理九里香之地,平凡的曾经的生生灭灭。
或者有人不再提起是因为恐惧,到一天恐惧的对象消失,他们便会开口,不过老实说我不知道他们是否能等到那一天。可是更可怕的是麻木。不是不能提,不该提,不堪提,是“为什么要提?”

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

The outline for my book (that will not be published) , Eng

Jianghu and Empire: Cultural Geographies in Chinese Contemporary Art

Background:

In Postmodern Geographies, Edward W Soja commented on an obsession with time in 19th century: time is considered to be rich and dialectic; space, to the contrary, is regarded as "the dead, the fixed, the undialectical,the immobile". In the fields of critical theory and epistemological production, the temporally-focused point of view
was expressed in the form of obsession with history and idling of geography. Although academic stars like Foucault had already expressed doubt towards this hegemony, it is obvious that enthusiasm about history in critical and
cultural theory has not yet faded away. In the contemporary art scene, the obsession is manifested as a drive towards art history. Although there are scholars who investigate the cultural geography of (Chinese) contemporary
art, the results are generally either regional stereotypes or absorption of cultural geography into art history. This essay aims at investigating Chinese contemporary art with reference to two spatially-oriented concepts:jianghu
and Empire.

Empire, a significant text by Antonio Negri and Michael Hardt, virtually maps the narrative and diagnosis on the sovereignty "Empire" in the context of globalization. (Although Negri's Marxist reference may raise suspicion about the possibility of historicism, the spatiality of Empire acts as a plane of immanence to thought.) The concept of "Empire" already existed during the Roman Empire, but Negri and Hardt's Empire in the context of globalization is not simply a heritage of antiquity, but also a fracture motivated by capital. The ceaseless self-production of capital
as a cancerous body-without-organs drives towards over-top national-states and super-national organisms while capital endlessly reproduces its own pattern. This ceaseless reproduction results in a weakening of the
independence of nation-states, which, along with other super-national organisms, are accommodated by the capitalist apparatus and "united under the logic of the single rule." The result is a new form of sovereignty: Empire.

The development of info-technology shortens or even erases the physical distances and hence strengthens the influence of Empire. Subjects are passively subsumed by the new sovereignty, like bodies inscribed with medical signs. The concept of Empire takes a crucial role in the production and identification of Chinese contemporary art.
Apart from Empire,jianghu is another cultural concept that is inseparable from the cultural geography of Chinese contemporary art.

jianghu, literally "rivers and lakes," initially referred to a name collectively for rivers and lakes. The term then transformed over time and becomes a word standing for either: the habitat of the hermit; or the environment where you min(the people who are outside of the ancient Chinese hierarchy comprised of government officials, peasants, workers and merchants) make a living. This essay adopts the latter.

Jianghu embodies an alternate space with loose organization and its own hierarchy and rules. As an industry for which it would be difficult to obtain a firm definition, contemporary art in China had a sphere of influence which is a
jianghu.

The geography of Chinese contemporary art depicts in a spatial form the simultaneity of the society and the map of power among producers and participants in the industry.
It is too imprudent to equate jianghu of Chinese contemporary art with resistance against the capitalist apparatus and Empire, as the relationship between jianghu and Empire should not be reduced to a simple dualism. Yet it is
even worse to think that they are equivalent. The two sometimes overlap: sometimesjianghuis the Lacanian symptom of Empire; sometimes jianghuis the metaphorical surplus of Empire.Despite the uncertainty, what can
be sure is that the two concepts are among the factors that determine the legitimacy of Chinese contemporary art.

Outline:

• “Empire" and "China": Concept of Empire and Chinese Contemporary Art in an International
Horizon
◦ This part investigates how the Empire concept is applied to the art mechanism and how the
concept molds the signifier “China art.” Under the mechanism of Empire, the independence of
China as a nation-state is weakened, and Chinese contemporary art is transformed to a noun
floating in the chain of signifiers, always drifting on its relative positions.

• Chinese Contemporary Art and the Concept ofjianghu
◦ This part investigates the history of jianghuas a concept in Chinese contemporary art and how
the participants in the scene interact with this cultural topography when transcending physical
geography.

• Interaction Between Empire and Jianghu in Chinese Contemporary Art
◦ Comparing the structure and symbolic networks in Chinese contemporary art under the
concepts of Empire and jianghu
◦ The influence on art production by the epistemology engendered by the suspension of physical
geography by Empire and jianghu
◦ Point de Capiton: This is the part probing into the overlapping and dislocation of Empire and
jianghuin the context contemporary art in globalization, with a focus on the expansion of
jianghuof Chinese contemporary art beyond the previous nation-state-geography boundaries
through globalization.
◦ The Name of the Other: Investigating the positions of Chinese galleries and artists in
international art events: Venice Biennial, Documenta and Art Basel, with a reference to concept
of "outsider" which Derrida mentioned inOf Hospitality.
◦ Who is whose symptom: The subjectivity between Empire andJiang Hu, and how it works on
art
◦ Biopolitics:jianghunever exists without people; Empire obtains its legitimacy from its
"multitudes"; this section analyzes how the politics between the people differ in the context of
jianghuand Empire
• Treading onJianghuand Striding through the Empire:Case Studies on Artists' Productionofa
Nation in a Nation/ Carrying the Tao to the West:Chinese
◦ Writing about the pioneers who made Chinese artist in an international horizon
◦ Artists: Cai Guoqiang, Huang Yongping, Xu Bing
• South to the Border:the "Southern" Artists in Cultural Geography
◦ Investigating how the “southerness” of the artists are produced injianghuand Empire.
◦ Artists: Chu Yun, Jiang Zhi, Liu Chuang, Zheng Guogu
• The World is the Corner: "International" / Non-Place Artist
◦ Focusing on how the Chinese artists who are considered to be international due to their
distance from conventional Chinese icons
◦ Artists: Cao Fei (early work), Adrian Wong, Xu Zhen

The outline for my book (that will not be published) , Chinese Version

(請勿轉載)

江湖與帝國:中國當代藝術的文化地理
by Venus Lau

Edward W. Soja 在Postmodern Geographies 提到19世紀人們對時間的迷戀:時間被認為是豐饒而辯證的,與之相反,空間卻是“死實,固定,非辯證和不變”的客體。時間主導的觀點在知識生產和批判理論上表現為對歷史的迷戀和對地理的投閒置散。縱使如褔柯之流的學術明星對這種一廂情願作出質疑,批判理論和文化研究界對歷史的迷戀仍未全面減退。此點在當代藝術表現為對美術史的狂熱。縱使有部份學者試圖探索(中國)當代藝術文化地理,結果卻是藝術典型化,或者文化地理被吸收為藝術史的一部分。本文將以“帝國”和“江湖”這兩個建基於空間性的概念,探索中國當代藝術。

內格里(Antonio Negri)和哈特(Michael Hardt)的著作帝國描述全球化語境下“帝國”主權的虛擬版圖。(帝國作者對馬克思主義的引用,難免會有歷史主義的意味,但是其帝國概念的空間性可作為思考的內在性平面Plane of immanence)資本作為“癌變無器官身體(cancerous body-without-organs)”,不斷複製自身的樣式,產生超越民族國家的要求。資本加速流通生產更多資本,民族國家的獨立性則日趨薄弱,它們連同其他超國家組織被資本制度編收;在單一,共享的邏輯下,築造了全新的主權形式 — 帝國。另一方面,信息科技的發達縮短甚至取消了物理距離,使帝國主權的影響力日益擴大,個體包括藝術只能被動地受其包攬,如醫學符號被刻寫在身體上,故帝國對目前中國當代藝術的生產和身份認同有密切的關系。

另一個與中國當代藝術無法分開的文化地理概念是“江湖”。江湖原本為江水湖泊總稱,后演變成隐士避世之處,亦指“游民”謀生的環境(本文取后者)。江湖是一“另類宇宙”,也是官方/傳統宗法制度的例外。江湖結構鬆散卻又具有自己的等級結構和规则,是“游民”浪蕩的世界。藝術作為難以定義的生產業,其有效範圍一如古時中國“四民”語境之外的江湖。中國當代藝術的江湖地理,以空間化形式,揭示現今社會的共時性(simultaneity),也展示藝術生產者之間的的權力地圖。

草草把江湖當成藝術對資本机器和“帝國”的反抗未免天真 — 二者的關係不可化約為簡單的二元對立 — 把二者等同卻更大錯特錯。帝國和江湖范圍偶有重疊,江湖時而是帝國的徵兆,又可以是帝國的隱喻剩餘(metaphorical surplus)。。。但可以肯定二者是中國當代藝術合法性的組成部分。

結構:

“帝國”和“中國”:國際視野里的中國當代藝術
-中國當代藝術里的“中國”是一個能指鏈裡的名詞,經常游移在相對的位置,此部分采用帝國概念探討“中國當代藝術”此能指的歷史

江湖概念和中國當代藝術
-探討江湖作為當代藝術文化地形學的歷史,江湖如何與藝術生產者越過傳統地緣政治互動

帝國和江湖在中國當代藝術的共同作用
-探討在帝國和江湖的概念下中國當代藝術的符號網絡和結構
-帝國和江湖懸置物質地理對藝術帶來的影響
-Point de Capiton:研究中國當代藝術江湖和帝國的重疊和錯位
,并集中討論當代藝術江湖如何通過全球化超越昔日的民族國家 -地理局限
-"他者之名":以德里达論好客的“外人”概念,看中國藝術在國際藝術事件 — 威尼斯雙年展/文獻展/巴塞爾 — 的位置
-誰是誰的征兆:探討中國當代藝術“帝國”和“江湖”的的主體間性(intersubjectivity)
-生命政治:江湖無人不立,帝國需要不斷尋求人的認受。此部分探討江湖和帝國語境下中國當代藝術的生命政治(biopolitics)

涉足江湖,通行帝國:藝術家個案研究

生產國中之國:“中國藝術家們”(蔡国强,黃永砯,徐冰)

討論把“中國當代藝術家”概念帶到國際視野的中國藝術先行者

“國境之南”: 文化地理中的“南方”藝術家 (儲云,蔣志,劉窗,鄭國谷)
探索文化地理產生的“南方性”

“世界就是角落”:“國際”/“非空間”藝術家 (曹斐,Adrian Wong,徐震)
討論與“中國符號”有所距離的國際藝術家